Exercises on the fundamental morphism theorems
Exercise 1. Let r and s positive integers such that (r,s)=1.
Consider the ring ℤr x ℤs (with respect to ordinary multiplication and addition, component by component), prove that the application f: ℤ ⟶ ℤr x ℤs given by a ⟶ (ār, ās) is an epimorphism of rings.
Prove (using the fundamental theorem of isomorphism for rings) that ℤrs and ℤr x ℤs are isomorphic.
Exercise 2. Let I1 and I2 two ideals of a ring R such that I1 + I2 = R. Prove that
R/(I1 ∩ I2) ≃ R/I1 ⊕ R/I2
Exercise 3. Using the first isomorphism theorem determine the isomorphism in case that R = ℤ, I = 4ℤ, A = 6ℤ.
Exercise 4. Using the second isomorphism theorem determine the isomorphism for the case R = ℤ, I = 10ℤ, J = 6ℤ.
Exercise 5. Determine all the ideals of ℤ24 by using the correspondence theorem.
Solutions
-
(a+b) maps to ([a+b]r, [a+b]s), which is ([a]r + [b]r) + ([a]s + [b]s).
(ab) maps to ([ab]r, [ab]s), which is ([a]r [b]r) ([a]s [b]s). So it's a homomorphism.
To prove surjectivity we must show that for (x,y) in ℤr x ℤs there's an a ∈ ℤ. Think about what the surjectivity requirement for the function means algebraically: it means for any x,y, the equations [a]r = x, and [a]s = y are simultaneously solvable.
a ≡ x mod r ⇐⇒ [a]r = x, a ≡ y mod s ⇐⇒ [a]r = y.
-
We proved that f: ℤ ⟶ ℤr x ℤs is a ring homomorphism, by the fundamental theorem o of ring homomorphism we know there exists a unique isomorphism f*: ℤrs ⟶ ℤr x ℤs if ker f = rsℤ. We have that ℤ/ℤrs = rsℤ. We have that the kernel of φ: ℤ → ℤ/nℤ sending a to [a] is {kn| k ∈ ℤ} Thus ℤrs ≃ ℤr x ℤs
Alternative proof. The map f: Zrs ⟶ ℤr x ℤs, defined by f([x]rs) = ([x]r, [x]s), is a ring isomorphism. By the Chinese remainder theorem the system of congruences
admits exactly one solution modulo rs. This implies the surjectivity and the injectivity of the map.
It's sufficient to find an epimorphism from R to R/I1 ⊕ R/I2 with kernel I1 ∩ I2. We define φ: R ⟶ R/I1 ⊕ R/I2 by letting φ(x) = (x +I1, x + I2).
R/I1 ⊕ R/I2 is the cartesian product of those rings so made of the ordered pairs (x+I1, x+I2). x ∈ ker(φ) would satisfy, by definition, that x+I1 = I1 and x+I2 = I2, hence that x is an element of both I1 and I2, hence an element of the intersection of these ideals: ker φ = I2 ∩ I1.
To prove surjectivity we must show that given a (r + I1, s + I2) ∈ R/I1 ⊕ R/I2 there exists a x ∈ R, such that φ(x) = (r +I1, s + I2). Since R = I1 + I2, r = a1 + a2, s = b1 + b2 for given ai,bi ∈ Ii (i = 1,2). The element x = a2 + b1 is such that
x ≡ a2 ≡ r (mod I1), x ≡ b1 ≡ r (mod I2)
hence φ(x) = (r +I1, s + I2).
We want to show that
A/(A ∩ I) ≃ (A + I)/I
4ℤ ∩ 6ℤ = 12ℤ, since an integer is divisible by both 4 and 6 if and only if it is divisible by 12. An we have 4ℤ + 6ℤ = {4x + 6y: x,y ∈ℤ } = 2ℤ, hence
6ℤ/12ℤ ≃ 2ℤ/4ℤ
If π: R ⟶ R/I, let π|A the restriction of π to A that is
π|A: A ⟶ (A+I)/I
It is a ring homomorpshim whose kernel is A ∩ I. By using the fundamental homomrphsim we have the following isomorphism
f: A/(A ∩ I) ⟶ (A+I)/I
-
ℤ/I = ℤ/10ℤ, ℤ/J = ℤ/2ℤ, J/I = 2ℤ/10ℤ ≃ [2]10ℤ10.
Using the second isomorphism theorem, we have the isomorphism f: ℤ/J ⟶ (ℤ/I)/(J/I) is defined as follows f(r+J) := (r + I) + J/I
f(0) ⟼ 0 + 10ℤ + 2ℤ/10ℤ = [0]10 + [2]10ℤ10 = {[2]10, [4]10, [6]10, [8]10}
f(1) ⟼ 1 + 10ℤ + 2ℤ/10ℤ = [1]10 + [2]10ℤ10 = {[3]10, [5]10, [7]10, [9]10}
f(2) ⟼ 2 + 10ℤ + 2ℤ/10ℤ = [2]10 + [2]10ℤ10 = {[4]10, [6]10, [8]10, [10]10}
The ideals of ℤ containing 24ℤ are: ℤ, 2ℤ, 3ℤ,4ℤ,6ℤ,8ℤ,12ℤ, 24ℤ, thus the ideals of ℤ24 are ℤ/ℤ24 = ℤ24, 2ℤ/24ℤ, etc.