The algebra of derivatives

Theorem 5.2.1. Let f, g: (a,b) → ℝ, differentiable on (a, b); then f ± g, fg, and f/g (g ≠0) are differentiable on (a, b) and the following properties hold:

  1. (f ± g)' = f' ± g'

  2. (fg)' = f'g + fg'

  3. (1/g)' = −g/g2.

  4. (f / g)' = (f'gfg')/g2

Proof.

  1. Derivative of a sum. The derivative of the sum/difference of two differentiable functions equals the sum/difference of their derivatives.

    ( f + g ) ( x ) = lim h 0 [ f ( x + h ) + g ( x + h ) ] [ f ( x ) + g ( x ) ] h = lim h 0 [ [ f ( x + h ) f ( x ) ] h + [ g ( x + h ) g ( x ) h ] = lim h 0 f ( x + h ) f ( x ) h + lim h 0 g ( x + h ) g ( x ) h = f ( x ) + g ( x )

    An analogous proof can be provided for the derivative of a difference.

  2. Derivative of a product. We analyze the difference quotient

    ( f g ) ( x + h ) ( f g ) ( x ) h = f ( x + h ) g ( x + h ) f ( x ) g ( x ) h = f ( x + h ) g ( x + h ) f ( x + h ) g ( x ) + f ( x + h ) g ( x ) f ( x ) g ( x ) h = f ( x + h ) [ g ( x + h ) g ( x ) h ] + g ( x ) [ f ( x + h ) f ( x ) h ]

    Here we have added and subtracted f(x + h)g(x) in the numerator and then regrouped the terms so as to display the difference quotients for f and g separately. Thus taking the limit limh→0 f(x + h) = f(x), and

    (fg)'(x) = f(x)g'(x) + g(x)f'(x).

  3. Since g is differentiable at x, it is also continuous at x by Theorem 5.2.1. Since g(x) ≠ 0, we know that the function (1/g)(x) is continuous at x. We have

    ( 1 g ( x ) ) ( x ) = lim h 0 1 h [ 1 g ( x + h ) 1 g ( x ) ] = lim h 0 g ( x ) g ( x + h ) g ( x + h ) g ( x ) = [ lim h 0 g ( x + h ) g ( x ) h ] [ lim h 0 1 g ( x + h ) g ( x ) ] = g ( x ) ( g ( x ) ) 2

    where we used the fact that

    limh⟶0 1/g(x + h) = 1/g(x)

  4. The quotient rule. Verify it by applying the rule for products and the reciprocal rule. □

The derivative of a composite function: The Chain Rule

Proposition 3.2 (Chain Rule) Let D,E ⊆ ℝ and f: D ⟶ ℝ, g: E ⟶ ℝ be functions such that f(D) ⊆ E. Suppose x is an interior point of E. If f is differentiable at x and g is differentible at f(c), then gf is differentiable at x and

(gf)'(x) = g'(f(x))f'(x)

Proof. We have

(gf)(x + h) − (gf)(x) = g(f(x + h)) − g(f(x))

For the sake of simplifying the notation, let

k = f(x + h) − f(x)

y = f(x)

then f(x + h) = y + k; from the continuity of f we have for h ⟶ 0 that k ⟶ 0. With the new notations

g(f(x + h)) − g(f(x)) = g(y + k) − g(y)

The derivative of g is:

g ( y ) = lim k 0 g ( y + k ) g ( y ) k

which can be written as well, for k ≠ 0:

g ( y + k ) g ( y ) k = g ( y ) + ϵ ( k )

Where ε(k) indicates a quntity that goes to zero for k ⟶ 0. By multiplying both sides of the former by k, we obtain

g(y + k) − g(y) = g' (y) ⋅ k + ε(k) ⋅ k

which is perfeclty valid for k = 0 as well. Thus

g(f(x + h)) − g(f(x)) = g' (y) ⋅ k + ε(k) ⋅ k

dividing by h and observing that k/hf'(x), we have proved the claim.  □

The Chain Rule has a particularly simple expression if we use the Leibniz notation for the derivative. Recall fg is defined as f(g(x)). The quantity f′(g(x)) is the derivative of f with x replaced by g; this can be written df/dg. As usual, g′(x) = dg/dx. Then the Chain Rule becomes

d w d x = d w d y d y d x .

Examples . If w(x) = (sen x)2, we have w '(x) = 2 sen x ⋅ cos x.

If w(x) = e−x2 then w '(x) = e−x2 ⋅ (−2x).

If w(x) = (sen cos x3)−2 then w '(x) = −2(sen cos x3)−3 ⋅ cos cos x3 ⋅ (−sen x3) ⋅ 3x2.   ■

Derivative of a periodic function

Let f: I ⟶ ℝ be a differentiable function, with period T, that is f(x + T) = f(x) ∀xI, then f' is also periodic with period T. We have if f is differentiable at x,

f ( x + T ) = lim h 0 f ( x + T + h ) f ( x + T ) h = lim h 0 f ( x + h ) f ( x ) h = f ( x ) .

Let f: ℝ → ℝ be periodic with period T.

Example 1. Verify whether f(x) = sin(x2) is a periodic function. Note that f(x) = sin(x2) is differentiable and f′(x)= 2x ⋅ cos(x2) which is unbounded. Therefore, f′ cannot be periodic by the first point, and hence f cannot be periodic by the second point.   ■

«Epoxides Index Sulfides»